A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between possible neighbours around the construction of the wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated nationwide awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods short article about René Collier plus the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building works at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, request to construct their relatives house. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, the place improvement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established residents. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being created by their future neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted below arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries in their internet site, resulting in an encroachment over a Distinctive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result locations are topic to strict controls below European and Irish environmental law. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, notably in the delicate coastal surroundings such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the correct posture. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal arranging disputes, the place sights of the sea are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the site, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image which has considering the fact that grow to be emblematic with the depth of your dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they ended up meant to Obtain visual proof of the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Situations reported, describing how The 2 men entered the water for the duration of extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the website turned One of the more striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely noted that this sort of steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a place affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected intimately through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as audience sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second while in the lawful timeline.
At the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement around boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as built, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been referred to as meticulous in his examination of setting up documents, maps, and conditions connected towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the world as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair only seeking to create a family members house in accordance With all the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Specific Place of Conservation and say that all will work happen to be completed according to Specialist information and permitted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into The ocean all through a storm, don't alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above design of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description for just a scenario a large number of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is now more contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had Formerly been involved with local advocacy on arranging and environmental troubles, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really diverse professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website in the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times and René Collier waded via midsection-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both equally the physical actuality of the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an extreme tactic.
Because the High Court proceedings go on, the end result remains uncertain. The courtroom will have to determine if the wall as created complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging disorders. Still the human ingredient remains central: neighbours who ought to Are living alongside each other long after the legal charges have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design works at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case increase further than that handle. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental challenges like environmental security and house legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partly built, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. No matter whether it will eventually in the long run be altered, taken off, or concluded as planned will rely on the courtroom’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible proceed to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.