A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between prospective neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has captivated national consideration following an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a delicate coastal environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which is partly crafted, is in the right situation. Their lawful group has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their see, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal scheduling disputes, where by views of the sea are both equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic initiatives by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced in the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations, a picture which includes since develop into emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they had been meant to Acquire visual proof with the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water for the duration of significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website turned One of the more putting descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of steps were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated in detail by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment from the authorized timeline.
Within the Main of the dispute is often a disagreement over boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes past what was accepted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become described as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting as an alternative that it is about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply just looking to build a household dwelling in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that all functions have been completed dependant on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea through a storm, never change the underlying information.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how organizing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above development of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for just a problem that a lot of observers see as significantly widespread. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Situations post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Earlier been involved in nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from quite distinct Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, became synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely Paul Feely and Rene Collier and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-higher h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waist-substantial drinking water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality of the coastline plus the symbolic character with the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom will have to figure out whether the wall as created complies with setting up permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning circumstances. But the human component remains central: neighbours who need to Dwell alongside each other extensive once the authorized costs are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction operates at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation lengthen over and above that deal with. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the value of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition, it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary difficulties which include environmental defense and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of normal magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Irrespective of whether it is going to finally be altered, taken out, or completed as planned will count on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.